![]() |
|
Making Their Mark in Stone and Steel2002/10/01
Such is the permanence of what they create, architects are
able to enjoy their successes far more than in any other
profession. They cannot fail to get a thrill each time they
drive past their latest eye-catching residential block, office
building, theater or any other construction that has been well
received by critics and the public. By the same token, they are also doomed to live with their
failures--the constant bricks-and-mortar reminders of creations
that looked good on the drawing board, but which prove to be
everything from impractical for their users to visual eyesores
constantly under fire by the selfsame critics and public. A
good example was the modern extension to one of London's
ancient major art galleries, slammed by Prince Charles as a
"monstrous carbuncle", and subsequently modified. Architects ruefully complain that whatever they design, it
never achieves universal acceptance simply because its impact
on people is almost totally subjective--a matter of personal
opinion. The same will probably happen as Beijing's huge range
of Olympics-related stadiums and other buildings take shape
between now and 2008. But there will be no complaints from
architects. For them, brickbats and bouquets are the name of
the game. So what does architecture really represent? Does a
wattle-and-mud hut in the jungle, built with materials taken
directly from the land, rate as architecture in the same way as
a marbled palace? Do modern architects try hard enough to marry
beauty with practicality in their creations, and vice versa?
And are so-called "intelligent" buildings the best path for the
future, as many architects insist? Whatever the answers, it remains a truism that a
building--any building, no matter how expensive and beautiful,
or ugly and inhospitable--is little more than an attractive but
empty box unless people inhabit it, and thus ordain it with
life. This is how it was in the beginning, and how it will ever
be. Most living creatures make some kind of shelter--a nest, a
hole, a hut. When the hut is consciously built to a pattern,
for example when facing the sun, or with sleeping quarters
separated from cooking space, the shelter becomes
"architecture" because it incorporates the basic architectural
elements of function, planning and ornament. Architecture reflects the life of the people who create it.
This is particularly true of one of the very earliest
civilizations, ancient Egypt, which lasted from about
3100-330BC. To the Egyptian ruling caste, a house was merely a
temporary resting place on the human passage to
eternity. The permanent abode was the tomb, so it was to tomb and temple building that pharaohs and priests directed the energies of their architects. Egyptian houses, built of brick and timber, have long since vanished. The tombs survive, and are among the most enduring of man's architectural achievements. |
| * |
京ICPè¯050057å·http://www.miibeian.gov.cn